AAP Arvind Kejriwal - Fascism and Hitler. Paradigm or Enigma?
Robert Paxton argues that fascism is "a form of political behavior marked by obsessive preoccupation with community decline, humiliation, or victim-hood and by compensatory cults of unity, energy, and purity, in which a
mass-based party of committed nationalist militants, working in uneasy but
effective collaboration with traditional elites, abandons democratic liberties
and pursues with redemptive violence and without ethical or legal restraints
goals of internal cleansing and external expansion."
Not being an academic nor a
political historian, I was intrigued by similarities, albeit partial,
between the subject under discussion and Hitler. AK exhibits some similar
characteristics and convictions, mainly, that he alone has been ordained to
solve the problems faced by the helpless people of India.
AAP and Hitler's workers
Party which later was better known as Nazi Party, exhibit similar strains of
fascism-exempt militancy for now. I say for now, as I did notice signs of
militant behavior among the AAP senior echelons - Bharti is a good example.
When a former Ambassador,
who happens to be a lady, goes public with her discomfiture with the
"Militant" men of AAP- the inner circle- and their patronizing attitude, it says it all. One can reasonably assume that she has had many
occasions to deal with all types of men while discharging her duties as a
diplomat and that there must be good reasons to go public on her strong
objections to the conduct of members of AAP. Until then she was a well-respected member of the core team of policy drafters. Their articulation on merits of Khap may
substantiate her claims.
When tens of thousands of
people chant "Arvind, Arvind" and shower their affection through a
show of faith, very few leaders can remain with their feet planted on Mother Earth.. It is an addiction that drives the subject of adoration to believe
them. Public show of swearing-in, mass contact programmes, and frequent Media
interactions for sensational revelations are all symptoms of a disease that is
known to convert an ordinary well-meaning individual into a megalomaniac. Arvind
would do well to note what Ashutosh Varshney wrote recently in an OPED
column, which suggested that there is a great difference between popular will
and popular sentiment - sentiment can quickly change. It is the people's
sentiment that needs watching.
The early days of Hitler
were full of some of the above characteristics. Germans wanted a change. They
thronged in large numbers to his sessions of public ranting and raving. He
began to believe in them and they in him. History is replete with instances of
such leaders, who from heroes became hated despots over time.
While the militant part of
AAP has not been on display, an occasion that needs serious introspection is
when AK threw an invitation to the Delhi Police to shed their uniform and join
his agitation on Raj Path. Sedition is more serious than militant behavior.
AK also threatened to disrupt the whole Republic Day parade, even as he went on
to question the sentiments of Indians and the need to participate in an
elitist display of marching columns. It exhibits a poor understanding of the implications of such actions and utterances. There is thus a reasonably good
chance of turning a peaceful demonstration (repeatedly emphasized by Anna
during a mass gathering of IAC) into a violent and destructive event.
Why would a group of fully
educated and well-experienced scholars, diplomats, bureaucrats, industrialists, and others not advise and guide a relatively less experienced engineer turned bureaucrat
on negotiating land mines on his path. It may well be the haste with which AAP
wishes to fully capitalize, on what they perceive to be a historic window of
opportunity.
Running before learning to walk first can be an exceptional
occurrence in individuals gifted to compress time-related activities. Movements
and reforms need time, careful handling, nurturing, and above all selfless
leadership. The Arab Spring, Libyan attempt to correct decades of misrule, and
the Egyptian political experiment in haste, give us enough material to
introspect.
AAP needs to consolidate,
learn to govern under a given framework of law, respect laws of the land before attempting to rewrite
them, and finally show the way to reform an arguably decadent system." A good
leader should also be a good follower", is an axiom worth reflecting upon.
Sir, In my opinion comparing the rise of AK with rise of Hitler is totally wrong since Hitler's rise was in a different scenario. If at all any comparison has to be made then the rise of Sadam Hussain is the ideal one or may be that of VP Singh in India, where there is a lot of similarities. One good point we have is that India is too big a country for any political party now or even the Armed Forces to take over or perform the role of Hitler. Yes, the situation will bring unstability, friction and may be anarchism too.There are more probabilities of a further division in the vote-bank politics on some ground to firm up their bases and thereby sacrificing the basic purpose of its creation. Rise of intolerance in the social behaviour all across is a matter of serous concern and needs to be addressed.In my opinion its just the political churning taking place and we have to wait for the whipped cream to surface.
ReplyDeletesir, i thought it was a pretty mean comparison... very unfair... there is greater danger to India from Modi. Khejriwal cannot be non-gandhian in his approach... it is the essential nature of his support base... he is logger heads with the established elite-centered culture and so those who have risen high in the present set-up will feel uncomfortable with what he is doing... trust me sir... the future of India lies beyond what K is doing... it lies in an empowerment of the little Indian in ways which will make a jawan essentially equal to an officer even while the rank structure remains the same and remains respected. This new energy born out of taking a zero tolerance stand on corruption is the platform... the team needs guidance... i am afraid that is not what your write up is indicating. Radical differences apparent in his views make sense when we see how we 'enforce' our 'west-born' views and approaches on the traditional hinterland of India... when that part of India speaks up we get jittery... Hitler did have a radical view... but he supplemented it with fascism... fascism is a violence driven approach... it makes you single out a group based on a label (not action or criminality) and bash them up... Modi does that... he exerts authority by fear psychosis... the terror of righteousness is something else... any way, I thought the comparison was unfair and i would have preferred it if you would encourage them to keep the basic disciplines of rule of law etc.
ReplyDeleteHaving been a politician for the last 4 years with a clear mandate that I would assist in creating and supporting structures and systems, I have an insight now which goes beyond the theory. My words were carefully chosen while extracting the relevant part of the definition in question. There are others who are trying to bring in the changes that you have alluded to in a practical and pragmatic manner as compared to Congress and BJP. The new generation parties such as AAP, Lok Satta and NBDP are trying to achieve just that -but AAP after sensing victory in Delhi has become just another party. I cannot support or endorse their actions. Let us say that we agree to disagree on the future of AAP.
ReplyDeleteTrue sir, they seem a little off the mark as of now... but even K has said that AAP is not ready for LS. What you say about systems and processes is right. This is what i recommend for AAP too... hopefully if they have a filter in place, where they bring in only honest and non corrupt people, then even these issues can be sanely addressed. Among those parties coming up new i see hope in this group more than in others... I have of late come to realize that accrediting agencies, for MBA institutions, focus on processes and systems and 'continuous development' rather than rigid philosophy or personality culture... I think that it is less important for AAP to say that 'this is our economic philosophy' than to say 'this is how we will choose an economic philosophy that is suitable for India at any given time'. This is what i recommend for them. I think any of these new parties that comes up with such systems... even for selecting candidates... and also ensuring that the top leadership in the party has reasonable authority to execute effectively... that team will offer the next real viable opportunity for the Indian electorate... besides of course the philosophy guiding this new team should be all-inclusive, and devoid of all chauvinism. AAP must learn and grow from it... if they dont... they will fall by the way side and another that uses these principles will flourish... Lets see...
ReplyDelete